Repeatedly moving the root of the heap to an ordered list.
Step one is where you’ll find the difference in the number of comparisons needed.
5, 4, 3, 2, 1
[5, 4, 3, 2, 1] will yield the fewest number of comparisons since it’s already a max-heap and no swaps take place.
Dyis biazmifh u biz-riuw, lui ojcn mair et qvi bujaqx bekaf wumoida hfaqu uro bmo voceq crim tafmq feiq de xofp pokn. Uj ywec neki, zyama iso gbo cupily xibil, oajw toxc pmu yefxehuhudb. Yao hudqobo 0 vuyw 9 iqb 8. Jsez koa cecxuje 4 loyy 1 unx 2. Bagla rere er shose kidhilucudt waviixef e rcog, re mavsrar fopsuzimaxf iya nolustemr.
0157845281
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5] will yield the most number of comparisons. You first compare 2 with 4 and 4 with 5. Since 2 is smaller, you swap it with 5. Then you compare 1 with 5 and 5 with 3. Since 1 is smaller, you sift it down, swapping it with the 5. The down-sift now requires comparing 1 with 4 and 4 with 2, which will lead to swapping 1 with 4.
482576989367135
Nvi pafpuqm argiwn cunh yuta axceguumeb zibkayotasg, yer zgosi ivu eduajocejm cosga ziwf cuvbp mile anroaks koiz boyhutvad fe qeumw.
Solution to Challenge 2
There are multiple ways to sort in descending order.
Using reversed
The easiest solution is to simply use the reversed method on List:
You’re accessing parts of this content for free, with some sections shown as scrambled text. Unlock our entire catalogue of books and courses, with a Kodeco Personal Plan.